Titles
Subjects
Languages
Search
Contact
Set Language
volume
collection
Export a Citation
Print View
hide main text
show main text
just this volume
show all volumes
Edition Information
Ordinatio. Prologue.
Ordinatio. Book 1. Distinctions 1 and 2.
Ordinatio. Book 1. Distinction 3.
Ordinatio. Book 1. Distinctions 4 to 10.
Ordinatio. Book 1. Distinctions 11 to 25.
Ordinatio. Book 1. Distinctions 26 to 48.
Ordinatio. Book 2. Distinctions 1 - 3.
Ordinatio. Book 2. Distinctions 4 to 44.
Ordinatio. Book 3. Distinctions 1 - 17.
Ordinatio. Book 3. Distinctions 26 - 40.
Collapse All
|
Expand All
frontmatter
titlepage
translator's preface
contents
book 3. distinctions 26 - 40
twenty sixth distinction
single question. whether hope is a theological virtue distinct from faith and charity
I. various possible solutions
a. first way
1. exposition of it
2. what should be said about this sort of way.
b. second way and consideration of it
C. third way, which is that of henry of ghent
1. exposition of it
2. rejection of it
3. what should be said about the rejection of the third way
II. scotus’ own response to the question
III. objections
IV. reply to the objections
V. to the arguments for the first way
VI. to the principal arguments
VII. to the arguments for the third way
twenty seventh distinction
single question. whether there is a theological virtue inclining one to love god above all things
I. to the question
a. loving god above all things is a right act
b. on the formal object of this act
1. three ways or opinions, from others
2. rejection of the opinion
3. scotus’ own response
C. whether an infused habit is necessary
1. opinion of henry of ghent
2. arguments of others against henry’s opinion
3. consideration of the aforesaid reasons
4. scotus’ own reasons against henry
5. scotus’ own opinion
a. how ‘above all things’ is to be understood
b. how the rational creature is bound to love god above all things
c. what the habit of charity is necessary for
II. to the arguments for the question
a. to the principal arguments
b. to the two arguments adduced in the second article
twenty eighth distinction
single question whether our neighbor is to be loved with the same habit as that with which god is loved
I. to the question
a. about the habit of charity for god and neighbor
b. about the habit one must have for one’s neighbor
C. who the neighbor is who is to be loved by charity
II. to the principal arguments
twenty ninth distinction
single question. whether everyone is bound to love himself most after god
I. to the question
II. to the principal arguments
thirtieth distinction
single question. whether one must love one’s enemy out of charity
I. to the question
a. on an enemy per se
b. on an enemy per accidens
1. on warding off acts contrary to love
a. as concerns spiritual goods
b. as concerns indifferent goods
c. a doubt about bodily life
2. on positive acts of love
II. to the principal arguments
thirty first distinction
single question. whether charity remains in the fatherland such as not to be extinguished
I. to the question
a. on faith and hope
b. on charity
C. conclusion
II. to the principal arguments
thirty second distinction
single question. whether god loves everything out of charity equally
I. to the question
a. god loves everything
b. this sort of love is not proper to any one divine person
C. how there is equality and inequality in the one act of god’s love
II. to the principal arguments of both parts
thirty third distinction
single question. whether the moral virtues are in the will as in their subject
I. to the question
a. opinion of aquinas
b. the opposite opinion of henry of ghent which rejects the opinion of aquinas
1. henry’s opinion in itself
2. against the reasons for aquinas’ opinion
3. against the conclusion of aquinas’ opinion
C. scotus’ own opinion
D. objections against scotus’ own solution
e. response to the objections
II. to the principal arguments
thirty fourth distinction
single question. whether virtues, gifts, beatitudes, and fruits are the same habit as each other
I. to the question
a. opinion of henry of ghent
1. exposition of the opinion
2. rejection of the opinion
b. opinion of bonaventure
C. opinion of aquinas
D. scotus’ own opinion
1. beside the theological and cardinal virtues there is no need for any other habit in this life.
a. proof of the opinion
b. about the connection of the intellectual, irascible, and concupiscible habits with these seven virtues
c. the seven virtues perfect the wayfarer simply
2. about the moral virtues, the beatitudes, the gifts, and the fruits, which are reducible to the aforesaid seven virtues
a. about the three moral virtues
b. about the beatitudes
c. about the gifts
d. about the fruits
3. conclusion
II. to the principal argument for the opposite
III. to the argument on behalf of the philosopher in the first opinion
thirty fifth distinction
single question. whether wisdom, science, intellect, and counsel are intellectual habits
thirty sixth distinction
single question. whether the moral virtues are connected
I. to the question
a. about the connection of the moral virtues with each other
1. opinion of henry of ghent
a. exposition of the opinion
b. rejection of the opinion
2. scotus’ own opinion
3. to the arguments for henry’s opinion
b. about the connection of the moral virtues with prudence
1. about the connection of any virtue with its own prudence
a. opinion of henry of ghent
b. scotus’ own opinion
2. about the connection of all the virtues in a single prudence
a. opinion of henry of ghent
b. scotus’ own opinion
C. on the connection of the moral virtues with the theological
D. about the connection of the theological virtues with each other
II. to the principal arguments
thirty seventh distinction
single question. whether all the commandments of the decalogue belong to the law of nature
I. to the question
a. opinions of others that converge in the same conclusion
1. exposition of the opinion
2. rejection of the opinion
b. scotus’ own opinion
1. double way of understanding how certain things belong to the law of nature
2. summary of theses stated
3. objection to the first thesis
4. response to the objection
II. to the principal arguments of both parts
thirty eighth distinction
single question. whether every lie is a sin
I. to the question
a. a lie is a sin
b. what sort of sin a lie is
1. about the three kinds of lies
2. opinions of others
3. scotus’ own opinion
a. about persons in the state of exercising perfection
b. about persons in a state of acquiring perfection
II. to the principal arguments
thirty ninth distinction
single question. whether all perjury is a mortal sin
I. to the question
a. about the idea of an oath
b. perjury is a mortal sin
1. solution
2. two doubts against the aforesaid
a. about the first doubt
b. about the second doubt
3. third doubt against the aforesaid
C. on the distinction of oaths and how specific oaths are sins
II. to the arguments
fortieth distinction
single question. whether the new law is heavier than the old law
I. to the question
a. about the burdens imposed
b. about the remedies and helps conferred on us
II. to the principal arguments
endmatter
footnotes
Ordinatio. Book 4. Distinctions 1 - 7
Ordinatio. Book 4. Distinctions 8 - 13.
Ordinatio. Book 4. Distinctions 14 - 42.
Ordinatio. Book 4. Distinctions 43 - 49.
SUBSCRIBER:
past masters commons
Annotation Guide:
All Collections
>
The Ordinatio of John Duns Scotus
>
Ordinatio. Book 3. Distinctions 26 - 40.
The Ordinatio of John Duns Scotus
Ordinatio. Book 3. Distinctions 26 - 40.
hide table of contents
show table of contents
Go to next volume
Go to next volume